It’s Media Monday: They’re pulping the books!

It’s Media Monday where I post my latest views on writing & publishing news…  Writing news

Book pulping. Is it a) a new a Tarintino film; b) a fist-fight at a literary festival; or is it c) the shredding of books from a library. Well, this week, Manchester Central Library has found itself in a pulping mess after – in an open letter to the Head Librarian (you can read it here) – a host of eminent literary names called for a halt to the destruction of thousands of library books from the vaults of the long-standing library. 

 

According to The Guardian, it turns out that for the past 18-months, Manchester Central Library has been culling – pulping – its stack of non-fiction books because renovations for the elegant domed building have not included enough room for, well, all the books.  You’ve got to question what on earth they were they thinking when the renovation decisions were being made. Just imagine the meeting where they discussed the library’s future. ‘Right, so, we need to renovate, yes?’ Cue murmurs of agreement. ‘It’s going to cost £170million and take three years. It will look fabulous. Any other considerations? Anyone? We’ll have enough space, right? Right? Great. Custard slice?’ Hmmm.  The thing is, I understand why libraries

Manchester Central Library
Manchester Central Library – but where are the books?

have this predicament. The more books they have, the more space to store them becomes an issue – it is a problem the New York Central Library is experiencing right now in their own renovations process.

 

But the point of a library is to have books. And those books are used by the people to learn, to expand their knowledge. Take older books away and you take away a history, a timeline of information and a generation of experience and thought. It turns out I’m not the only one who thinks this way. In their open letter, the literary figures said: “We are concerned that far too much of the irreplaceable collection is in danger of being lost forever. We demand that the current destruction of stock is halted and that a thorough investigation of the library’s disposal policy is carried out.”

 

In this age of the digital book, there is a clear argument that the use of books via such media can provide constant access to literature resources whilst saving valuable space and money. This I agree with in many ways. But to destroy old books, just like that, with no consultation with the public who use them and in many ways you could argue own them? That’s wrong. Would artifacts be destroyed from a museum? Or Royal documents or jewels be scrapped? Of course not – so why these books?

 

The Manchester Central Library was built in the Great Depression as a symbol of hope, its vast circular inscription reading “exalt wisdom and she shall promote thee”. Maybe, before they destroy any more books, the powers that be should stop and read that inscription for a second. At least it’s one set of words that can’t be pulped – I hear stone’s is hell to pick out of a shredder.

 

 

 What do you think? Should books be pulped or kept?

 **Look out for Wednesday Wafflings where I post my latest entry of my Diary of a Hopeful Author**

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “It’s Media Monday: They’re pulping the books!”

  1. Highly agree Nikki. As a huge book lover and one who is loath to throw away even half chewed weetabix covered chidlren’s ones, this is awful. Agree it defeats the object.. Even throwing away my old University notes has just happened but with regret as they had gone mouldy in the garage after being untouched for nearly 15 years. Compelely mad management decision if you ask me – they need to consider the wider picture – too kneejerk a decision. Glad literary people got in there first. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!

    Like

    1. Fightin’ talk – I like it! You kept all your old Uni notes? That’s impressive! Darn mold getting in the way. Libraries don’t have a mold issue, and yet still they are culling the stocks. Sometimes I wonder that, in the future, children wll grow up and ask – a bit like with LPs today vs downloads – what’s a library. Fight it!

      Like

  2. I’d have thought that even out of date encyclopaedias should be preserved in some form or another (even if it’s digitally), because at the very least they’ll give us a snapshot of what we once knew or believed at their time of publication. o_O

    Like

    1. Nice to meet you. Thanks for commenting! I like the idea of a snap shot of what we believed – that’s a huge reason why factual library books have to be kept. A good point well made. Let’s hope they don’t all let it go – where would we be then?

      Like

Hey there! You weren't going to leave without commenting, were you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s